17: In conclusion...

So that’s it. Those are the emails and that’s the story.

After reading all of these posts, is anyone else wondering why the five other members of “The Accused Six” didn’t interpret my words the same way Member A claimed to, and the same way management did? Why didn’t my peers, my friends, interpret my words incorrectly? It’s because I have become close with them, and because they know me. Member A (who was a recent addition to the “email loop”) does not know me, and nor does management.

Who, of the following four choices, is the least qualified to interpret words written by me… circle all that apply:
a) myself
b) my peers… the ones to whom the words were intended
c) a stranger (and late addition to the email loop) with an agenda
d) a few more strangers who happen to have the power to ban accounts

Answer that question honestly, and you’ll get the honest answer to the whole mess. Oh, and please feel free to share it.